Lifestyle, travel, fashion & home ideas for your coffee break

AI at Work: Why Most Staff Are Teaching Themselves

Plenty of companies talk big about artificial intelligence. Far fewer are teaching their people how to use it. A national survey of more than 1,000 employed…

Technology3 min read3 weeks ago
By Brew and Browse11 October 2026
AI at Work: Why Most Staff Are Teaching Themselves

Plenty of companies talk big about artificial intelligence. Far fewer are teaching their people how to use it. A national survey of more than 1,000 employed workers in the United States, carried out by the resume service Resume Now for its BYO AI Report, suggests staff are largely working it out for themselves.

The picture of AI at work that emerges is one of enthusiasm outrunning support.

AI at work: training is thin on the ground

The headline figures are striking. Some 41% of respondents said their employer had offered no tools, training or guidance at all. Only 19% said they had received comprehensive AI training. Put another way, around four in five workers are making it up as they go along.

Of the rest, nearly a third report only light, surface-level help that makes little difference in practice, and 8% say their company’s efforts fell short of what they needed.

Bring your own AI

With so little on offer, workers are helping themselves. More than three in four have used AI tools they found and signed up to personally, rather than ones their employer provided or approved, to get work done.

Keith Spencer, a career expert at Resume Now, described this as a sign that people are trying to keep up, and also a sign of where employers are lagging. His view is that encouragement is not enough. Staff need approved tools, time to build their skills and guidance that fits their actual roles. Without that, AI use becomes patchy and harder to manage, and the efficiency gains bosses are hoping for can slip away.

Guidance is patchy too

Even where rules exist, they are often not much use. Just 21% of respondents have clear, practical guidelines with specific use cases for their own jobs. For everyone else the picture looks like this:

  • 26% have generic advice that does not really apply to what they do
  • 16% hear almost nothing from management
  • 5% are getting mixed or contradictory messages
  • 4% have been told to avoid AI altogether

Meanwhile, 28% simply do not use AI at work at all.

What employers could do differently

Handing someone a powerful tool does not teach them when, where or how to use it safely. A new tab in the browser is not a training programme.

The survey points to a fairly straightforward fix. Skip the vague memos and one-size-fits-all induction slides, and instead give people clear, role-specific examples of what good use looks like. The firms that do well with AI are unlikely to be the ones with the biggest budgets. They will be the ones that explain things best.

What this means for ordinary employees

If you are one of the many people quietly using your own AI accounts for work, you are in good company, but it is worth being careful. Tools you found yourself have not been checked by your employer, and nobody has told you what is safe to paste into them.

A sensible first step is to ask what your company allows, and to suggest a few real tasks from your day that AI could help with. Specific examples are exactly what the survey says most people are missing. Managers who hear a clear request are far better placed to turn scattered experiments into something the whole team can use.

If you are a worker in the middle of all this, it is worth asking your manager what is approved and what is not. If you manage a team, a short, clear set of examples may do more good than another policy document.

Brew and Browse

Lifestyle, travel, fashion and home ideas for your coffee break.